New Tiger 1200 prototype been spotted

Had a look at the salon in Lyon, looks a lot better in the flesh, felt very comfortable for rider and pillion just sitting on it

This was the second good surprise after the NT1100

Could be tempted but it’s bloody expensive :nod
 
Another glowing review.

And pinched from the vid

ff593b8c6108aab780c5aec7e43ce548.png

4f7134e210c30642edd0bb8a7d33e5a5.png

804cbf402621d225efec88a8435d6ae8.png

2bcf54cbec47af50a522905d7ad9d487.png

178a420a660407c83bea21da12a2c5f8.png
 
I took out a new 1200 GT Pro for 2 1/2 hours this morning and did a good 100 miles or so.

Thoughts ?

Looks nicely screwed together.

4900791d1807d3595961b4f850fdd0f9.jpg

4c7da76f374b5c6f6233c2178a9112ca.jpg

1e142f0258fef1d17f91da433b0f6adc.jpg


Great TFT with easy navigable menu using a joystick

9469bda12a747614057a486b146db3cc.jpg

d72037139d8e305843ce18deada69e38.jpg

4a2db97f5d869257123d74049c25a7ac.jpg


It’s immediately very comfortable.The seat is brilliant as is the screen.
On high position it was very good at providing protection whilst still giving a small amount of cleanish air around/over the body.
On low, the airflow was directed at upper chest,which is fine in my opinion.

High

0402f03b44277afc45c505706a836e25.jpg


Low

2188354f372fca01cb6fd63d6ab21d13.jpg


The screen is adjustable one handed on the fly.

The engine ?

Well…..it’s certainly not lacking in power.The T-plane crank with it’s uneven firing order puts out something like 148bhp and 130Nm of torque.
It does sound a bit odd.It’s certainly lacking that lovely triple growl of previous models, yet it doesn’t have the grunt of a twin.
Sitting at 60 mph in 6th is about 3500 revs and 70mph is 4200 revs.
Redline is 9500.The bike flies from about 5500 revs but that means you need to knock it down a couple of cogs for a decent overtake, unlike something like a KTM 1290 which has instant grunt.It’s also lacking in much engine braking.

The throttle, which must be fly by wire is also a tad odd.It doesn’t have any play like a Multi V4 but feels a bit disconnected at low revs.Also, at a standstill, if you let the clutch out towards biting point then the revs increase.Feels odd but may well be a design feature to aid a quick getaway.

Indicators are quite clever in that a short press enables 3 flashes before self-cancelling and a long press gives about 8.

Quick shifter was good. Not as good as on my 1290R but ok.The gearbox was a tad notchy though.

I averaged 48mpg over my short ride.

Heated grips have three stages but even on high could barely be felt.

Heated seat wasn’t working !!!

Handling was good but it’s missing that low c of g tip in feeling that is so prominent on the latest KTMs and obviously a GS trait.

Good points

Great seat/riding position/comfort
Easily adjustable and useful screen
Shaft drive
Back lit switch gear
Good TFT

Bad points

Needs revs to ….er….make progress :)
Heated grips are weak
Heated seat was fucked !!!
Low down fuelling.

Overall thoughts ?

I was slightly underwhelmed.
Comparing it to my 2021 KTM 1290R, it’s not as powerful or grunty, the handling is nowhere near as sure footed and you need to get it above 5500 revs to really get a shift on.

It’s lacking the grunt and engine braking of a twin but the 1-3-2 firing order masks it being a triple, even if it provides more grip and stability.

I’m sure it’ll sell well and is a good bike if you must have shaft drive.

But ,IMHO, the latest 1290 is streets ahead, and I’ve only ridden the SAR !!!

0fdf631fe5de925349e1dfd00f006807.jpg
 
That's a nice honest review Arsey,thanks for posting.Did you find any weight issues with the bike?I really like the looks of it and like the proper upswept high level end can,no doubt I'll find one parked up somewhere so I can give it a proper look over.

Kimbo :beerjug:
 
That's a nice honest review Arsey,thanks for posting.Did you find any weight issues with the bike?I really like the looks of it and like the proper upswept high level end can,no doubt I'll find one parked up somewhere so I can give it a proper look over.

Kimbo :beerjug:

It feels quite light, though still a tad top heavy, if that makes sense ?
Easy to push around etc.
 
Looks like the various design teams forgot to talk to each other…….
 
Still, it looks a sight better than the old TEX. That was a real monster to manoeuvre; I recall many of us pulling out of booked test rides at the launch, which proved a wise move when the shit hit early adopters.

However, the new engine tune makes little sense. Maybe it will encourage Yamaha to develop a T9 & T12 - their 900 triple is a sweet motor ...........https://www.rideapart.com/news/582448/yamaha-tenere-900-digital-renders/
 
Engine Tune :confused:

Do you mean the T-Plane Crank ? :nenau

No - I would have expected a T-plane crank 1200 triple to produce plenty of low end power & torque, yet testers all seem to comment on the bike being rev hungry or buzzy (whatever that might mean).

There has to be something - ECU, Euro5, fuelling , cam profile - something that is influencing that power/torque curve.

Surely most of us would sacrifice a little top end, in exchange for low/mid range tractability & instant grunt. This is big adv, not a sports bike.
 


Back
Top Bottom