Hey Wapping thanks for the reply ,just looked at the jacket and indeed there is a strap at the back. I just figured it out I'll give it a try thanks again
Cheers
Jolly good. It should loop through a plastic ‘ring’ on the front of the jacket.
Hey Wapping thanks for the reply ,just looked at the jacket and indeed there is a strap at the back. I just figured it out I'll give it a try thanks again
Cheers
specially if your belly pushes it out a bitI think as a lot of jackets are now shorter with low waste trousers so there’s less weather protection around the waste
Guilty as charged….very muchspecially if your belly pushes it out a bit
Guilty as well like a burst matressGuilty as charged….very much
You're in shape.Guilty as charged….very much
you're right rukka is a wasteYou are a victim of fashion.
I have a Rukka suit which is now 6 years old. Done about 60k miles init and never been wet.
BUT…….it is cut in the traditional touring style, IE a longer jacket.
I think as a lot of jackets are now shorter with low waste trousers so there’s less weather protection around the waste
No. It’s not a waste, it’s just a lot of money for what it is.you're right rukka is a waste
that's why i went for hideout salopettes and one of their jackets and no longer suffer from a wet front
No. It’s not a waste, it’s just a lot of money for what it is.
I agree with that one. I love my Rukka gear it’s kept me dry for thousands of miles some of it in really bad rain.joke fell flat
its waist not waste
but having had two sets (i know more cash than sense) i think they are a waste of money when you can get tailor made for less or the same (Hideout and BKS) and have the features you want that fits you not a dummy